SHARE
When preparing a proposal for a potential client, defining a software development budget is necessary but rarely simple. Software projects evolve as they’re built: requirements change, technical constraints emerge, and early decisions introduce uncertainty into cost predictions.
Even experts struggle with accuracy: only 8% of teams feel very confident in their estimates, and just 44% aim to stay within 10% of actual cost. Yet despite this uncertainty, founders still need a ballpark estimate even if it’s expected to change.
In this article, we explore:
A ballpark figure – is a rough cost estimate used when key details of a product are still unknown. Instead of an exact number, it provides a general range and helps start early talks about priorities and budget. This illustrates the general ballpark meaning in business: giving a rough idea of costs before detailed calculations are ready.
At this stage, product scope is still changing, technical choices haven’t been made, and many assumptions remain open. Detailed estimation isn’t practical yet.
Ballpark estimates are a useful starting point, but it’s important to remember they’re only preliminary. Early numbers work best when everyone agrees on scope, constraints, and potential risks.
Here are the core factors that make ballpark estimates rough:
At first glance, projects may seem familiar: dashboards, mobile apps, integrations. This similarity creates a false sense of predictability.
Reality: custom software requires tailored decisions at every level. Differences in tech stack, architecture, integrations, performance requirements, and user experience drastically affect cost. Two similar-looking products can demand completely different approaches.
Most custom software can’t be built at a fixed price because teams usually work on a time-and-materials basis. Costs depend on the actual hours spent by developers, designers, and QA engineers, and as requirements evolve, early estimates rarely match final costs.
Estimates assume an ideal, linear workflow. Real projects rarely follow that.
Factors like team experience, communication quality, onboarding speed, and decision-making influence delivery. Even small miscommunications or delayed feedback can shift timelines.
Two companies can estimate the same project differently.
Without shared assumptions, ballpark figures can mislead clients with a false sense of certainty.
Projects almost always evolve after the first meeting.
New design details, edge cases, compliance requirements, accessibility needs, or platform constraints surface, adding effort and cost. Ballpark estimates fail here because they rely on incomplete knowledge.
Custom software often interacts with external systems, legacy infrastructure, or regulated environments.
Third-party integrations, changing APIs, security rules, and regulatory updates introduce risks invisible at the estimation stage.
Without a shared understanding of what a ballpark estimate is and how it works, early, unrealistic estimates can erode trust. Even if labeled as “rough,” they may create frustration and harm long-term partnerships. Clear communication and transparency are more valuable than optimistic guesses.
So let’s take a closer look at the specific challenges you might encounter with ballpark estimates:
While hurdles exist, the following solutions help create more accurate and predictable estimates:
Break projects into smaller tasks and evaluate time, resources, technology, and risks for each.
Example: Instead of “add user accounts,” break it into login, password reset, permissions, and admin panel.
Use methods like Planning Poker or story points to involve the whole team.
Example: Developers identify edge cases or technical constraints missed in early planning.
Compare to similar past projects and use estimation tools to increase accuracy.
Example: A previous booking feature helps anticipate timeline and cost.
Conduct a Discovery Phase to gather requirements, identify technical challenges, and define a roadmap.
Example: Discovery may reveal hidden needs, such as integrations or admin features.
Identify risks early and define processes for handling changes.
Example: If a third-party API changes, a clear change process prevents unexpected costs.
Q1: What is a ballpark estimate in software development?
A rough cost range is used early in a project when many details are unknown.
Q2: Why are early software estimates often inaccurate?
Unique projects, changing requirements, human factors, and unknown risks make early numbers unreliable.
Q3: How can teams make more reliable estimates?
Through detailed scoping, agile techniques, historical data, discovery phases, and risk management.